In February 2013,
the United States and the European Union leaders declared plans to
negotiate a wide-ranging and high-standard free trade agreement (FTA) between
the US and the EU. The agreement is referred to as Transatlantic Trade and
Investment Partnership (TTIP).
Formal negotiations initiated
in July 2013, and thirteen rounds of negotiations have been held to date. If
concluded as anticipated, TTIP could be the largest FTA in the world in terms
of economic size. TTIP aims to enhance market access through the elimination of
tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade and
investment in goods, services, and agriculture. TTIP negotiations are
addressing a broad range of areas.
Key to this blog is TTIP’s
negotiations surrounding food trade. There are fundamental differences between
the US and the EU approach toward evaluating food safety. The EU looks to the
Precautionary Principle as its regulatory foundation, essentially a “better
safe than sorry” approach. The US employs a “risk assessment” approach linked
to cost-benefit analyses when reviewing food safety standards. As a result of
these contradictory methodologies, the EU generally has higher food safety
standards than the US. However, in some areas the US has advanced standards
such as banning ruminant materials in livestock feed that can lead to mad cow
disease.
In terms of
farming practices in both regions, vast differences exist between the two
systems. In particular, are the controversial processes banned in the EU but
routine in the US. The differences in practices are based on a different approach
to food safety and include the often-cited US practice of washing chicken
in chlorine, to the use of growth-promoting hormones in pigs and cattle
processes.
There are also
huge differences in the treatment of genetically modified crops, with a fundamental
ban in the EU and extensive use in the US. The maximum residue levels for
pesticides on fruits and vegetables are 500 times higher in the US than in
the EU. At the same time, the spread of industrial factory-farming
methods is in stark contrast with Europe’s farm to fork approach.
This blog will track TTIP developments and efforts to harmonize
regulations and claims of equivalences in the standards.
No comments:
Post a Comment